ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PELAKU PENIPUAN PROYEK INVESTASI YAYASAN FIKTIF AL-FALAH JAMBI (Putusan Nomor 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb)

Kisty Nabilla Herman, Kisty Nabilla Herman (2022) ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PELAKU PENIPUAN PROYEK INVESTASI YAYASAN FIKTIF AL-FALAH JAMBI (Putusan Nomor 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb). Tesis thesis, Universitas Batanghari.

Text B 20031010 - KISTY NABILLA HERMAN.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

ABSTRAK Kisty Nabilla Herman / B 20031010 / 2022 / Analisis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Penipuan Fiktif Proyek Investasi Yayasan Al-falah Jambi (Putusan Nomor 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb) / Dr. Hj. Suzanalisa, S.H., M.H., sebagai Pembimbing 1 / Dr. H. Ibrahim, SH, M.H.LL.M., sebagai Pembimbing 2 Tindak pidana adalah perbuatan melakukan atau tidak melakukan sesuatu yang memiliki unsur kesalahan sebagai perbuatan yang dilarang dan diancam dengan pidana. Berkaitan dengan perbuatan yang merugikan kepentingan umum yang di anggap meresahkan masyarakat salah satunya ialah melakukan penipuan. Sebagaimana yang ditegaskan dalam Pasal 378 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana pelaku tindak pidana penipuan dapat di ancam penjara paling lama 4 (empat) tahun seperti halnya penipuan Fiktif Proyek Investasi Yayasan Al-falah Jambi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Untuk memahami dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaku penipuan fiktif proyek investasi Yayasan Al-falah Jambi (Putusan Nomor 218/Pid.B/2019/ Pn.Jmb). Untuk memahami dan menganalisis vonis dijatuhkan terhadap pelaku penipuan fiktif proyek investasi Yayasan Al-falah Jambi (Putusan Nomor 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb) sudahkah memberikan efek jera terhadap diri terdakwa dan mencerminkan rasa keadilan. Di dalam penulisan Tesis ini penulis gunakan tipe penelitian Normatif yang kemudian di dukung dengan data Empiris sedangkan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah Socio-Legal Research. Berdasarkan pertimbangan unsur dalam Pasal 378 KUHP tersebut telah terbukti secara sah dan menyakinkan terdakwa telah melakukan tindak pidana sebagaimana yang telah didakwakan penuntut umum dalam dakwaan alternatif Kesatu Pasal 378 KUHP dan oleh karena tidak ditemukan alasan pemaaf yang meniadakan sifat melawan hukum dan alasan pembenar yang meniadakan kesalahan dalam diri terdakwa, maka terdakwa harus dinyatakan bersalah dan kepada terdakwa harus dijatuhi pidana yang setimpal dengan perbuatannya yang ancamannya menurut Pasal 378 KUHP tersebut diancam dengan pidana penjara paling lama 4 (empat) tahun. Tetapi dalam perkara ini terdakwa dijatuhi pidana penjara selama selama 1 (satu) tahun penjara berdasarkan putusan tanggal 3 Oktober 2019. Putusan majelis hakim yang pada akhirnya hanya menjatuhkan vonis 1 (satu) tahun penjara terhadap terdakwa dinilai masih belum mencerminkan rasa keadilan bagi pihak korban. menurut penulis, vonis yang dijatuhkan masih terlalu ringan dan tidak sepadan dengan perbuatan terdakwa, mengingat terdakwa melakukan perbuatan penipuan tersebut secara berlanjut dan nilai kerugian yang ditimbulkan cukup besar. Saran yang dikemukakan bahwa Hendaknya majelis hakim dalam menimbang serta menjatuhkan putusan wajib memperhatikan sisi keadilan dari pihak keluarga korban yang tertipu mengingat mejelis hakim hanya memperhatikan sisi keadilan dari pihak pelaku, jangan sampai di dalam pertimbangan dan putusan hakim tersebut menimbulkan perdebatan. Kata Kunci : Analisis, Putusan Hakim, Pelaku, Penipuan Fiktif, Proyek Investasi ABSTRACT Kisty Nabilla Herman / B 20031010 / 2022 / Analysis of Judge's Decision Against Fictitious Fraud Perpetrators of the Jambi Al-falah Foundation Investment Project (Decision Number 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb) / Dr. Hj. Suzanalisa, S.H., M.H., as 1 advisor and Dr. H. Ibrahim, SH, M.H.LL.M., as 2 vii nd advisor. A criminal act is an act of doing or not doing something that has an element of error as an act that is prohibited and is threatened with punishment. In connection with actions that are detrimental to the public interest which are considered disturbing to the community, one of them is committing fraud. As emphasized in Article 378 of the Criminal Code, perpetrators of criminal acts of fraud can be threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 4 (four) years as is the case with the fictitious fraud of the Jambi Al-falah Foundation Investment Project. The purposes of this study are To understand and analyze the basis of the judge's legal considerations in making decisions against the perpetrators of fictitious fraud in the investment project of the Jambi Al-falah Foundation (Decision Number 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb). To understand and analyze the verdict handed down against the fraudulent perpetrators of the fictitious investment project of the Jambi Al-falah Foundation (Decision Number 218/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jmb) has it given a deterrent effect to the defendant and reflects a sense of justice. In writing this thesis, the author uses a normative research type which is then supported by empirical data, while the approach used is socio-legal research. Based on the consideration of the elements in Article 378 of the Criminal Code, it has been proven legally and convincingly that the defendant has committed a crime as charged by the public prosecutor in the first alternative indictment of Article 378 of the Criminal Code and because there is no excuse for forgiveness which negates the nature of being against the law and justification for eliminating the error. within the defendant, the defendant must be declared guilty and the defendant must be sentenced to a punishment commensurate with his actions, the threat of which according to Article 378 of the Criminal Code is punishable by a maximum imprisonment of 4 (four) years. However, in this case the defendant was sentenced to prison for 1 (one) year in prison based on the decision on October 3, 2019. The decision of the panel of judges which in the end only sentenced the defendant to 1 (one) year in prison was still considered not to reflect the sense of justice for the victim. According to the author, the verdict handed down is still too light and not commensurate with the defendant's actions, considering that the defendant committed the fraudulent act continuously and the value of the losses incurred was quite large. The suggestion put forward that the panel of judges in weighing and making decisions must pay attention to the justice side of the victims' families who were deceived considering that the judges only paid attention to the justice side of the st perpetrators, not to be taken into consideration and the judge's decision to cause debate. Keywords: Analysis, Judge's Decision, Perpetrators, Fictional Fraud, Investment Projects

Actions (login required)

View Item