ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA MEMBAWA SENJATA TAJAM TANPA HAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI JAMBI (Studi Kasus Nomor: 183/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jmb)

Wanda Eka Saputra, 1900874201269 (2023) ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA MEMBAWA SENJATA TAJAM TANPA HAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI JAMBI (Studi Kasus Nomor: 183/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jmb). skripsi thesis, Universitas Batanghari Jambi.

Text (ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA MEMBAWA SENJATA TAJAM TANPA HAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI JAMBI (Studi Kasus Nomor: 183/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jmb)) WANDA EKA SAPUTRA (19-1269).pdf - Published Version Download (1MB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Criminal acts regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) have their own limitations to distinguish between one crime and another. Regarding unlawful acts, one form of criminal act is the misuse of sharp weapons. Juridically carrying sharp weapons or misuse of sharp weapons as stipulated in article 2 of Law Number 12 of 1951. The issue raised is What is the basis for the judge's considerations in passing a decision on the crime of carrying sharp weapons without rights in the jurisdiction of the Jambi District Court (Case Study Number: 183/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jmb). Does the decision handed down in the crime of carrying sharp weapons without rights in the jurisdiction of the Jambi District Court reflect a sense of justice in society. The specification of this research is descriptive analytical research. In writing this thesis, the writer uses a normative juridical approach. Based on a consideration of the elements in Article 2 of the Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951 it has been proven legally and convincingly that the defendant has committed a crime as charged by the public prosecutor in the Single Charge of Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Emergency Law Number 12 1951 with a charge of 7 years in prison. then the defendant must be declared guilty and the defendant must be sentenced to a sentence commensurate with his actions, the threat according to Article 2 of the Emergency Law Number 12 of 1951 is punishable by imprisonment for a maximum of 10 (ten) years. However, in this case the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 4 (four) months in prison based on the decision dated April 23, 2022. The sentence handed down was still too light considering the defendant had committed a crime which was considered to be very troubling to the community. So the prosecutor's indictment, namely 7 years in prison and the judge's sentence which only handed down 1 (one) year and 4 (four) months in prison, is considered to still not reflect the sense of justice in society. The suggestions put forward should be for defendants who abuse sharp weapons to be sentenced even more harshly to give a deterrent effect to the accused Keywords: Analysis, Judge's Decision, Crime, Carrying, Sharp Weapons, Without Rights

Actions (login required)

View Item